Supreme Court Case & STRIKE

AINVSA/CEC/2013/0010                             Dated 1^th February 2013

                    Notice of AINVSA

  Support the righteous and avoid the imposters

To

All CEC, REC, SEC Members & Unit Members of AINVSA,

Principals & Staff of JNVs

Staff of ROs and HQ

Sir/ Madam,

It when all the hopes of pension was shattered by the terrible disaster brought about by the Ranchi H C case filed by Sri.P N Misra a writ was filed by by Sri. S Kannan (Principal JNV Canacona, South Goa)& Others v/s Union of India& Others Writ Petition(Civil)518 of 2012.The affidavit of this case was prepared by the full support of AINVSA. Our documents were also profusely used in preparing the affidavit. We could also supply some of the key documents. We have no question of honesty and reliability of the persons involved in the case. The office bearers could not be signatories of the case as we feared that it could cause a bit of confusion by certain unwanted elements whose purpose is not to win pension for the staff but monetary benefit and credit. Hence we whole heartedly appeal all staff of JNVS, ROs and HQ to help by liberally contributing towards just enough expenditures. We shall be highly obliged to every well-wisher who makes such contributions and convince others about the Writ which will be taken up the 4^th of February 2013.Let us hope the best to secure our future life.

In this connection I would also like to clarify a couple of points no matter it raises unnecessary feathers. But at the outset I would like to emphasize that we are always in favour of reasonable strikes and court case as NVS has always been keeping an antagonistic attitude to welfare of NVS staff.

1)        The verdict of the Ranchi case left every one shattered and hopeless.As responsible service organization we had advised Sri.P N Mishra to include the documents available with us to save the retirement life of thousands of staff by getting a winning edge. It was hyped up that Sri.L B Reddy had authorized Sri.P N Mishra to file the case. It is clear that he had not looked into the textual aspects of the affidavit.When the controversy regarding credit and money arose Sri.L B Reddy and P N Misra broke apart. I would like to assert the point that AINVSA did not authorize Sri.PN Mishra to file the case either in Ranchi H C or SC. Even after the failure of the case we had held discussions with Sri.P N Mishra during the summer vacation and advised him not to go for an appeal but to file a fresh case by including some of our nominees. We had also pushed forward the demand that the accounts have to be transparent and unnecessary amounts should not be accumulated. Since AINVSA is not recognized by the government it has been found that any Dick and Harry can collect money by deceiving the innocent employees in the name of pension. Our appeal is that every member of staff has to be cautious about this matter and in case of any doubt we may be contacted. If Sri.Mishra was earnest in this matter he should have shared some amount for the case being waged by Sri.Kannan & others. Now pension has become a lucrative business for some deceivers.

2)        It is quite surprising that Sri.L B Reddy also filed a case in SC on behalf of AINVSA. (W.P.No.556/2012).An attempt was made to claim that his case was filed before the WP of Sri.Kannan&others.Now he is also following Sri.P N Mishra in collecting money. It is true beyond any doubt that Sri. Sri.L B Reddy could not get a share of the porridge from Sri.P N Mishra hence he too has started demanding money from the hapless and confused staff.It is our earnest appeal to all that they have to restrain themselves from contributing because such unauthorized collection of fund is going to kick up a lot of controversies and administrative action.

3)        JAC was formed with the singular intention of demanding GOI Pension. Later 10% SA was also added to it. It is very important for every member of staff and association office bearers that Sri.L B Reddy was never in favour of holding strikes by staff. In all the JAC meeting he was the only person we vehemently opposed strike and filing case in SC. On the other hand his idea was to hold dharnas and maha meeting and facilitate the flow in and out of money. We were against such futile business.

4)        It was made clear by Sri.J K Singh and Sri.Arun Gaur at  the CEC meeting held at Radhakrishna Mandir that Sri.L B Reddy was instrumental in the withdrawal of the indefinite strike. Sri.V L Balasubramanian also divulged the fact, if not in public but in privacy. It was also revealed by some HQ staff that when the indefinite strike was being called off Sri.L B Reddy was hobnobbing with some top officers of NVS. So we categorically state that the withdrawal of the indefinite strike was  the beigest treachery in the annals of  struggle of NVS staff. We had also demanded the participants of the meeting which saw the fateful withdrawal of the indefinite case to release a communique for the benefit of the people. But still now the people are kept in the dark. Why ?

5)        The Mass CL as a means of strike is not bad. But the context and timing and the way of decision making and execution are not appreciable. Since the Pension case is in SC it would have taken a natural course. Some of the leaders involved in the strike also held such opinion in the past as the matter is subjudice. There was no state committee meetings and CEC meetings to decide the matter.As some political parties engage in some activities the leaders here too fear that they would be forgotten by the people if they do not come to the circus ring and get engaged in entertaining the people around. It is also a mean of extorting money from them in the name of expenditure involved in transport stay and food expenses.

6)        The staff of navodaya have always exhibited some characteristic gullibility. They get drawn by the fiery words of their leaders who will immediately withdraw into the chambers of NVS officers for relaxation and fun. People are highly disoriented. They often fail to recognize honest attempts. We had send warning signas when Sri.P N Misra was demanding vakaltnama and affadavits from every individual staff. But despite our warnings the frustrated people send their valuable money and documents. The HC verdict should be an eye opener for them. The HC severely criticized the petitioner for his last moment frustration. We had also warned  the petitioner that the new advocate would ditch him. What was the need of the hour was not vakaatnama but strong points to for defense. Still people are groping in the dark. Do navodayans understand?

I am not sending a lethal note. There is no brick batting, no mudslinging, no malign campaign, so self-lionizing, no character assassination. I have been striving for staff welfare. It was with that singular intention that we had given flesh and blood to our service association during a time which could be compared to the medieval period of NVS.I am pained to see the clowns romping all around. The spectators getting looted and mesmerized clap their hands without knowing what is actually happening.

I have put the right things in the right slots. There responsible people to answer. There should be intellectual honesty and purposefulness. Brinkmanship and feigning will only be lapped up for some time.

Before I sum up I would like to request you all to identify the fraudulent ones in the play.

I also appeal to you look forward to the case filed by Sri.S Kannan & others. Contribute to the case,  support the righteous and avoid the imposters.

Thank you,

Yours faithfully,

                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                (T.P.Mani)                                                                                                    

             National President

                   AINVSA,CEC