Sir,
For every good thing there can be a subversive action by some vested interests.This is what happened to our pension issue too.That is what is happening still now,too.
We have made extensive discussions with eminient advovates.They proposed to us to file cases in any number of HCs.In order to avoid multiplicity of verdicts we can transfer the case to SC.
Of late some people have come to oppose this attempt. They are the people who with their political clout and lenience towards Delhi NVS administration had connived with them and made arrangements to call a meeting on 28th January 2010 and finally forced the leaders to withdraw the Indefinite Strike. Most surprising thing is that though Sri.V L Balasubramanian and Sri.RS Naik have been accused by them for having contrived to effect the debacle and treachery they were out of frame in this issue.Reasons: after the 23rd meeting they had left for their respective places.They had atteneded the 25th JAC Meeting held at Pune. By the time they reached Delhi the stage was stage for the withdrawal. It was done by intimidating the rast of the leaders. The most intriguing fact is why Sri.V L Balasubramanian and Sri.R S Nail conceal the truth. If they have commitment to the 17,312 people they should reveal the truth.
The court case in Jharkand HC is not strongly supported by arguments and documents. If the case doesn’t click this will have widespread repercussion on the case if it is taken to SC. But a case won at HC will give us a winning razor edge at SC.
Please see the details of the Jharkhand Case
In the court of Jharkhand at Ranchi
Civil Writ Jurisdiction
W.P(s)No.4966 of 2008
Shri.P N Mishra …………. Petitioner v/s The Union of India & Others ………………………… Respondents
Subject : Quashing Matter
Index
01. An application with affidavit
02. Annexure-1 A photocopy of the Gazzette notification dated 31.07,2000
03. Annexure-2 A Photocopy of the original Office Order No.F.N.6-1/92NVS(Admn.)Dated
30.03.1992
04. Annexure 3 Series
A photocopy of recommendations of the parliamentary standing committee of NVS,New Delhi together with report no.198 and copy of the recommendation of Commissioner dated 29.12.06
05. Annexure 4 Series
Photocopy of the office copy of representations dated
01.05.2008,17.06.2008,06.08.2008,21.08.2008
Arguments
01. To adopt and implement uniform pension rule as has been adopted and made applicable for
other educational institutions
02. NPS is ultravires to article 14,16 and 21 of constitution of India and derogatory to teaching
and non-teaching staff.
03. Application of article 22.6 of constitution of India
04. To quash order at annexure -1
05. Respondents action is arbitrary making discrimination with NVS/JNV teaching and non-
teaching staff.
06. NVS adopted CCS rule in the meeting held on 17.01.92
07. Chaturvedi committee recommendation to introduce CCS pension(1972)
08. Meeting held on 29.12.06 headed by commissioner NVS recommended pension benefits at
par with other educational institutions
09. Petitioner’s association requested all authorities.
There are hundreds of documents and arguments.Why such people avoid all this ? Do they want the case to fizzle out and people get cheated once again to consolidate their near relation with Delhi NVS administration ?
Let us think independely.
Let our thoughts be not controlled by others
Let not others put their words in our mouths.
Tailspin
A case was filed in Kerala CAT on 21st December,2001.
Another case was filed in Hyderabd CAT
Still another case was filed in Delhi CAT
Still one more case was filed in Hyderabad HC.
Who minds the truth ?
If you are really serious be honest and pay heed to honest words.Dont get deceived.
Yours sincerely,
Rajan K M
No comments :
Post a Comment