The Finance Ministry has hiked interest rates on General Provident Fund (GPF) to 8.8%. This comes into effect from April 1, 2012. This move will benefit millions of Central Government employees who are subscribers to this fund.This interest rate of 8.8 per cent will apply for 2012-13 and is higher than the 8.6 per cent rate for the December 2011-March 2012 period
Friends , AINVSA is the oldest Association of JNV staff of NVS,comprising of teaching as well as non-teaching staff. Please RENEW your Membership,every year. Kindly take a clip of the filled and signed form and send it to whats app no: 8511264993 /9660756089 "TO GET RECOGNITION OF AINVSA". Only 35% Membership required... HURRY UP
You are Visitor No:
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Interest Rate on General Provident Fund (GPF) hiked (increased) to 8.8%
The Finance Ministry has hiked interest rates on General Provident Fund (GPF) to 8.8%. This comes into effect from April 1, 2012. This move will benefit millions of Central Government employees who are subscribers to this fund.This interest rate of 8.8 per cent will apply for 2012-13 and is higher than the 8.6 per cent rate for the December 2011-March 2012 period
Monday, May 28, 2012
NVS Hqrs Implications???
NVS,HQs. vide its letter
No.12-6/2012-NVS(Estt.)/1334 dated 15.05.2012
has requested to furnish the data
pertaining to employees , for analyzing implications of extending the new pension
scheme to employees of NVS who joined prior to 1.1.2004.
Thursday, May 10, 2012
AINVSA (Mani Group) RECIPROCATES to JNV Ranchi Unit ( Mishra..) 's PLEA
AINVSA/CEC/2012-13/12
Dated 5th May,2012
To
Sri. P N
Misra
Office
Superintendent
Jawahar
Navodaya Vidyalaya
Ranchi, Bihar
Sub: Proposed Supreme Court case on GOI Pension-support
of AINVSA
Sir,
I am extremely happy to understand that you have
realized the need to go to Supreme Court with GOI Pension for the staff of NVS
with the full support of AINVSA in the wake of negative verdict in Ranchi High
Court Case .In this connection I would like to share the following facts with
you:
1.
I had cautioned
you about the disastrous result of Ranchi High Court case well in advance. My
premonition was as a result of studying your affidavits and all the replies you
had filed subsequent to NVS’s rejoinders. Though we had numerous documents to
support our cause which I was ready to share with you before the final hearing
which would spell out the judgment unfortunately you could understand the
sincerity and seriousness of my words and you had neglected my warnings. You
were over-confident about winning the case. This was the cause for our failure.
2.
Though you had
stated that you were authorized by AINVSA the court maintained in the verdict
that the case was originally an individual one but it was claimed to be
filed by the Association(out of
frustration and fear of failure) .
However to save the situation you had requested the staff all over India to
file affidavits which itself was unwarranted. This duality was observed by the
court as “The petitioner has unnecessarily without
any such authorization (by AINVSA) taken upon himself as representative(of
AINVSA) and impleaded all the employees of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti as
co-petitioners, although none of them has come forward on their own before this
court”.
3.
You had changed
the advocate just before the final verdict and hoped that the new advocate
would bring us a sure win in the case. But the truth remained that the new
advocate sensed our frustration and exploited us, hence the final result. The
new advocate was sure that we were hell-bent to go to SC which would mean a
hefty profit for him.
In this crucial juncture I would like to
categorically state the following for your cooperation:
1.
Authorising you by AINVSA to file the case in SC
seems to be absurd ( reread the court’s version) and inappropriate as it will
convey the message that the Association is unable to file the case and therefore it wants to authorise someone for
the purpose. It will make the situation similar to Ranchi Case .I don’t want a
repetition of Ranchi fiasco as it involves the life of about eighty thousand
people. Therefore, the case will be
filed by AINVSA(not by authorization) in which you will be a co-petitioner
along with Sri.J K Singh, the General Secretary
and Sri.A K Gaur , the Working President.
2. A committee consisting of experts in this matter has
to be formed who will closely monitor the entire exercise. The affidavits will be filed only after the approval of such a
committee. Assurances in Ranchi case were flimsy and I had warned that the
affidavits were inadequate.
3.
All accounts will be
considered from the date of forming the committee. We want complete
transparency in this case and expenditure statement(in item-wise detail) should
be circulated among all staff on monthly basis. The balance amount after Ranchi
case has to be declared and accounted hereafter.
4. I have hundreds of documents and representations to
the Government, MPs and NVS. Such documents must be taken into consideration
while filing the case. So blank assurance as in the Ranch case will not be
prima facie accepted. We have to include all strong points.
5. The SC case will not be in the nature of appeal on
Ranchi case but it will be a fresh case
in the SC.
Kindly extend your support on the issue as we cannot take chances as in Ranchi
case Please make necessary arrangements
for a core committee meeting at New Delhi immediately with the cooperation and
involvement of Sri.J K Singh.Please keep me informed.
Thank you,
Yours faithfully,
(T P Mani)
National
President,
AINVSA,CEC
This letter is circulated to all CEC members for
acceptance and cooperation. Pls talk to me or sms your approval
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)