Send your suggestions as comments for changes if any in the rough draft format of letter by AINVSA

 

                          DRAFT FORMAT of Letter to be sent by AINVSA

AINVSA  gives an applause and a pat on the back of the Organisation NVS for the inclusion of Para 2.2 of NVS Hqrs circular dated December 22,2015 addressed to the Deputy Commissioners of all Regional Offices.,exempting the much suffered class of employees namely : a) Differently disabled b) Medical cases c) Employees working under Special Bond and d) Spouse employees waiting for unification  , from TRANSFER COUNTS with reasons. It suggests NVS to release the list of Annual Request Transfers 2016 in proper hieararchy and in the order of priority . The Transfer list of (a)  should be released and then b) etc  which has been given exemption from Transfer Counts/ completing Normal tenure for that matter.

Nevertheless, the Special Bonds of 3 years should not be at par with those who have worked for Special Bond of 10 years. Similarly ,working in hard station for simpy 03 years should not make them entitle to supersede those of the above clause (d) of Spouse Category .Hence , the priority and hierarchy interse should be analysed and with just discretion to the satisfaction of all concerned.

Secondly, AINVSA has received grievance from different quarters regarding   unrealistic optimism to Spouses of NVS by this Circular------that the employees working under Special Recruitment Drive  for North East Region have almost completed their Special Bond of 10 years( or  for that matter even a minimum of 03 years at Hard Station )would be given Plain area Transfers this year, as their hierarchy is above the Spouse Category   

All those employees coming out in large numbers from  North East Region would make the aspiring Spouses in dearth of  common places for both the posts, subsequently making them live in separation once again,  though making them fill the forms or  givng them the  exemption from Transfer Counts Para 2.2  ibid . It seems NVS is not at all conceding to DOPT Circulars of UNIFICATION OF SPOUSES in the true sense.

It will be just a façade to materialise in future days, created by putting the Spouse Category below Special bond category; if the priority is not interchanged between clause© and clause(d) of Para 2.2 .

There is good and sufficient reasons to modify the clause c) and d) of Para 2.2  as  under , shared by some of the staff., and interchanging or enhancing Spouse Category from Clause d) to c) in the said Circular… modifying the Priority among  the four ‘exempted  from Transfer Counts’ category in the interest of the organisation.

          
1.   The Spouses would work with more dedication as in the same station.
2.   The Spouses residing in one govt quarter and utilising common single  
       infrastructure, electricity water supply etc, would save the resources of JNV in particular
       and Govt in general.
3.   Spouses  going on leave  would reduce and prolong stay of the Staff of different
      genders in the premises, essential for the Safety and Security of JNVs
4.   The escorts of wife with husband and vice versa would help NVS in deputing Escort duty
       with ease
5.   The Spouses, in a nut shell, would work as a family for the  Vidyalaya's  
       holistic development .

Special Recruitment drive employees of Special bond on completion of 3 years or 10 years would not leave any conducive or coveted place for the Spouses. The employees under Category of Clauses (a),(b) and (d) are less compared to that of (c) . Consequent upon this all the three category of (a)Differently disabled, (b)suffering from serious ailment/disease  and(d) Spouse Category should be above in hierarchy of the (c)   Special Bond Category.

NVS vengeance   towards Court or CAT Spouse Cases is visible in putting Spouse Category as d) instead of Clause c) in the said Para 2.2 ; repercussions of such injustices to the Spouses awaiting Unfication is not at all  in the larger interest of the Organisation.

NVS is only under Obligation to give Special Bond Category Transfers but not   necessarily  contravening DOPT Circulars as such. The Priority decided upon by NVS calls upon reconsideration and the SPOUSES instead dropping out of JNVs would be checked, and under the obligation of NVS on the other hand  for this favour and sympathetic reconsideration.

ThankingYou

Yours faithfully